Toute l'actualité de l'engagement actionnarial par PhiTrust

Notre impact:
- 1450 initiatives privées
- 120 initiatives publiques
- 27 résolutions externes déposées

Depuis plus de dix ans, nous croyons que l’éthique du management et la gouvernance ont un rôle fondamental au sein des entreprises dans lesquelles nous investissons pour le compte de nos clients.
Face aux défis immenses de la crise que nous vivons aujourd’hui, nous sommes de plus en plus convaincus que nos entreprises cotées en Europe ont besoin d’actionnaires minoritaires actifs qui les aident à développer des stratégies innovantes pour répondre aux enjeux financiers, commerciaux et sociaux de notre monde actuel, et nous essayons d’y contribuer par notre stratégie d’investissement.

30 septembre 2013

Let us not fight the wrong battle to shield our businesses !

Two government bills to shield French businesses emerged from parliamentary debates: a preemptive right of purchase for employees when their business is to be sold and the standardisation of double voting rights. Though intention is commendable, both measures show how much, in France, simple-looking policies are preferred no matter if they miss the target.
We all know that preemption for employees in case of buyout is utopian for, ultimately, it will be used rarely, given the lack of long-term capital in France (as both left and right political players have consistently refused to undertake policies that would enable a long-term saving invested in shares). Worse yet, such a measure will make the company law more complex and is likely to lead plenty of foreign companies to favour, as for their investments, European countries with no such constraints...
Similarlly, the standardisation of double voting rights will give those who are not ready to pay the price for a company an opportunity to control it with a small equity percentage as it happened with Saint-Gobain, Accor, Carrefour, Vivendi... to quote only some of the cases that have been hitting the headlines in recent years. In vain we have for many years spelled out to French biggest companies' CEOs, that a small minority shareholder would not feel like staying in a company for double voting rights... unless these enable to control the business... Offering premium dividends to long-term ownership would be better, for this is the only instrument likely to motivate a more lasting ownership of every shareholder.
For once that political players and CEOs agree on promoting together a reform to shield the capital of our businesses, they favour simple-looking measures though without any actual scope; and this was done in spite of two obvious measures which could be set out in order that numerous French become shareholders of our businesses again: it is absurd that shares directly hold be subject to wealth tax (ISF), income tax (IR), added-value tax, and to social security contribution (CSG), while the ownership of artworks or old cars be entirely exempt from it ! What would you opt for if you had cash assets to invest ?
It is absurd that civil servants should deduct from their taxable income the contributions to PREFON (a pension fund reserved for civil servants or related ones) while private sector employees have no similar opportunities of deduction, since they are not allowed to use funded pension schemes...
To exempt from IR, ISF and CSG every investor or employee directly holding French shares over more than 8 or 10 years would allow to lead an important mass of private capitals towards businesses and to gradually recreate a mass shareholding we are today sorely short of.
Allowing businesses employees to contribute to funded pensions and to deduct the same amounts from their IR just as civil servants – if those are invested in shares – would encourage plenty of employees to increase the stake they have in their businesses and thus create a genuine employed shareholding, which have hardly been developed for lack of a political will to promote this type of shareholding.
Both measures would in the long run have a much more significant scope than the trivial measures being discussed today in Parliament and be a true political signal for a will to reconstitute a base of private shareholders in France, i.e. one of the best ways to protect our businesses whilst reinforcing their equity capital so that they invest in France and recreate as a result a positive job-creating dynamic.
But this implies to accept equally that the state, the institutions and the unions alone can not be a sufficient shield to protect our businesses and that the demonisation of shareholders together with discriminating tax schemes are much more effective in weakening our businesses, which would on the contrary love to develop in a stable legal and tax background. Gentlemen – politicians – let us not fight the wrong battle !

Olivier de Guerre
Chairman of PhiTrust Active Investors